MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043154522

Redefining retirement

2020· article· en· W7043154522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWrightConversationSquare (algebra)RomancePersuasionIdeal (ethics)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

B everly C lark Wright is quick to tell folks what lured her to Columbia fro m California." Marriage," she says with a sparkle in her eyes and a smile tha t broadens her face.And s he h as a school reunion to thank for re-uniting her and high-school sweetheart Merle Wright.Both Beverly and Merle graduated from Centralia (Mo .)High School.After receiving a bachelo r's degree in education fro m MU in 1955.she taught school in Denver and San Francisco for a tota l of 37 years.Her address was not in the high school's files.and when i1 came time to organize the 199 1 reunion.a commiuee member enlisted Merle's h::lp in finding her.Several calls to the California TeachersAssociatio n ne tted h im s weet resu lts.Beve rly was pres ide nt of t he M a r in County chapter of the association. a nd through the persuasion of her friends.she not only re turned his call, b ut she a lso auended the reunion.Afterward.a nearly two-year Jong -distance romance culminated in a proposal.Plans for a June wedding -the second for both -began to take shape, but in a telephone conversation one day in April 1993, Merle mentioned that he was taking a business trip 10 New Orleans."Beverly said, ' If someone I loved asked me to e lope to New Orleans.I would say y es, '" he recalls.Merle invited her, she accepted and the Your Ideal Home in 1995Dan Seabaugh can find it for you! 2-story home features 7500 square feet of finished living area on 21.4 1 ~.gtntrafolojantiljuari4nfuci1 'l !

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri)Same topicRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207