MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043205548

Sa?l?k i?letmelerinde hizmet kalitesinin sa?l?k hizmeti sunan ve sa?l?k hizmeti alan taraflarca de?erlendirilmesi

2015· dissertation· tr· W7043205548 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace Repository · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Studies and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSERVQUALQuality (philosophy)Health servicesQuarter (Canadian coin)Health careQuality of life (healthcare)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sa?l?k ve sa?l?k hizmeti sunumu, insan ya?am?n?n s?rd?r?lmesinde, ya?am kalitesinin yarat?lmas?nda ve korunmas?nda ?zel bir ?neme sahiptir. Bu bak?mdan, sa?l?k kurumlar?n?n verdikleri hizmetlerin kalitesinin ?l??lebilmesi?? elde edilen veriler do?rultusunda hizmet kalitesini artt?rmas? y?n?nde ?nemli bilgiler sa?layarak sa?l?k i?letmelerinin gelecekle ilgili planlar haz?rlamas?na, politika ve stratejilerini belirlemesine ?nemli katk?s? olacakt?r. Ama?: ?al??man?n temel amac?, II. Basamak Devlet Hastanelerinde sunulan sa?l?k hizmetinin kalitesinin sa?l?k hizmetini sunan ve alan taraflarca de?erlendirilmesidir. Y?ntem: ?al??man?n evrenini, Manisa ?l merkezinde bulunan II. Basamak Devlet Hastanelerinden sa?l?k hizmeti alan hasta ve hasta yak?nlar? ile bu hizmetini sunan sa?l?k ?al??anlar?nda olu?an 648 ki?i olu?turmu?tur. Veri toplama arac? olarak, Parasuraman, Zeithaml ve Bery taraf?ndan geli?tirilen Servqual Analizi kullan?lm?? ve ikinci k?sm? ile uygulanm??t?r. Verilerin analizinde SPSS 13.00 program?ndan faydalan?larak, ?ncelikle ge?erlilik ve g?venilirlik analizleri yap?lm??t?r. Daha sonra tan?mlay?c? istatistikler, T testi, ANOVA testi, Korelasyon ve Regresyon analizleri yap?lm??t?r. Bulgular: Toplanan verilere yap?lan Fakt?r Analizi sonucunda Hizmet Kalitesinin be? boyut'u ?? boyut alt?nda s?ras?yla?? "G?venilirlik-Heveslilik", "G?ven-Empati" ve "Somut ?zellikler" ?eklinde toplanm??t?r. Bundan sonraki t?m analizler ?? boyut ?zerinden yap?lm??t?r. Hasta ve hasta yak?nlar? ile sa?l?k ?al??anlar?n?n demografik ?zelliklere g?re de hizmet kalitesi alg?lar?nda farkl?l?klar oldu?u saptanm??t?r. Sonu?: ?al??man?n sonu?lar?na g?re, sa?l?k hizmeti sunan ve sa?l?k hizmeti alan taraflarca Hizmet Kalitesinin de?i?kenlerinin ba??nda "G?venilirlik-Heveslilik" gelmektedir. Di?er de?i?kenler?? "G?ven-Empati" ve "Somut ?zellikler" olarak s?rlanm??t?r. Sa?l?k hizmeti sunan hastanelerin ?zellikle bu boyutlara odaklanmas? gerekmektedir. Ara?t?rma sonucunda da teyit edildi?i gibi hizmet kalitesinin y?ksek olu?u, hastalar?n hastaneyi tekrar tercih etmeleri ve ba?kalar?na tavsiye etmelerini sa?lamaktad?r. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sa?l?k i?letmesi, Hizmet, Hizmet Kalitesi, Servqual Health and health care report, carried in people's lives, to create quality of life and has special importance in the protection. in this regard, the delivery of health institutions that can measure the quality of service, according to the data obtained in the direction to increase the quality of service by providing important information on the health of future business plans to prepare, to identify policies and strategies will be important contributions. Aim: The main goal of the study, 2 the quality of health services in public hospitals, the step of offering health services and areas is assessed by the parties. Method: Work in the universe, manisa provincial centers in the 2nd the field of public hospitals, patients and health care segments of patients with relatives who provide this service of 648 people formed health. As data collection tool, Parasuraman, Zeithaml and developed SERVQUAL Analysis by Bery used and applied only in the form of the second part is applied with. benefit from analysis of data in the SPSS program by 13:00, first the validity and reliability analysis has been done. then the descriptive statistics, t test, ANOVA test, correlation and regression analysis were made. Findings: Factor Analysis of data collected as a result of the five dimensions of service quality in three dimensions, respectively: 'reliability-responsiveness',' trust-empathy 'and' tangible property 'in the form was collected. over the next three dimensions are all the analysis has been done. patients and health workers with close patient according to the demographic characteristics of service quality was found to be differences in perception. Conclusion: According to the results of studies, the field of health services and health services by offering quality services at the beginning of the variable 'trust-responsiveness' to come. other variables' trust-empathy 'and' tangible property 'as is limited. health services, especially in the hospitals must focus on these dimensions. As the research results confirm the high quality of service, patients prefer the hospital again and encourage others to give. Keywords: Health Business, Service, Service Quality, SERVQUAL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it