MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7043416913

Stigma and Discrimination in Schizophrenia

2009· article· en· W7043416913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStigma (botany)PsychosocialMental illnessMental healthNeglectSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Social stigmaSocial discrimination
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Title: Stigma and Discrimination: The Mumbai Experience Main Author: Amresh Shrivastava MD, DPM, MRCPsych, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. Co-Authors: Gopa Sarkhel, MA, Iyer Sunita MA, Thakar Meghana MA, Shah Nilesh, MD, DPM Address of Presenter: Executive Director, Mental health foundation of India (PRERANA Charitable Trust) Mumbai, India; Currently at Department of Psychiatry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Address: Regional mental health care, 467 Sunset Drive, St. Thomas, N5N 3V9, St. Thomas, Ontario, Canada Phone: 1-5196318510; Fax: 1-519-631-2512. E-mail: amresh.edu@gmail.com Background: People with schizophrenia suffer from stigma and discrimination to a great extent, and this continues to be a major factor preventing treatment and social integration. This study was part of the WPA’s ‘Open-the-doors’ global anti-stigma programme. Aims: The main objective was too describe the manifestations and impact of stigma in family members and patients with schizophrenia in the metropolis of Mumbai. Method: A semi-structured survey was given to the members of three hundred families of schizophrenics attending a carer's meeting—an ongoing psycho-educational and self help support group activity. Two hundred and twenty four responded (75% response). Results: Results showed that stigma and discrimination were present in social, personal, and occupational spheres. It caused poor self-esteem (69%), discrimination within families (50%), marital problems (44%), and employment discrimination (42%). It mostly manifested in the form of neglect (61%), offensive comments (46%), and negative projections in the media (32%). A major source of stigma was identified as the general community (69%), leading to psychosocial consequences such as hiding the illness (38%), lack of acceptance in families (31%), refusal for jobs (27%), social exclusion (23%), and social harassment (14%). Conclusions: Stigma and discrimination affected all areas of life and caused negative psycho-social impacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicMental Health Treatment and Access→French-language works237,207→