Sleep behavior and motor development in children aged 12 to 18 months
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The health monitoring of the child in the first years of life is essential, since alterations in the neuromotor development and sleep behavior can be detected by the professionals, who ameliorate risk situations through early interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sleep behavior and motor development of the 12- to 18-month-old child using the Infant Sleep Questionnaire (ISQ) and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). To verify the association of the sociodemographic and educational variables of the caregiver and neonates with the final scores of the Infant Sleep Questionnaire (ISQ) - Brazilian version and AIMS. This cross-sectional and quantitative study was carried out at the Pediatric Outpatient Clinic of a reference hospital in Fortaleza, CE, Brazil, and at home. Its sample is made up of 50 children and 50 caregivers, from April to October 2014. Participants were approached by direct search of medical records or contact with parents and professionals of the service; For this purpose, an instrument for the characterization of the participants, ISQ - Brazilian version and AIMS, approved by the Research Ethics Committee under protocol No. 422.103. Most caregivers are female (92%), with a mean age of 29 years and the majority between 25-34 years (50%), stable union (44%). Among females, females predominated (58%), gestational age between 35-41 weeks, born full term (84%), between 12 and 13 months of chronological age (36%), mean of 14.58 Months. The prevalence of normality (score <12) in 29 (58%) children was determined according to the final ISQ (Brazilian version), in children's sleep behavior classification. Most caregivers (62%) reported that their children had no sleep problems. There was a significant association between the final ISQ score (Brazilian version) and the criterion of the evaluator (p = 0.000). Regarding the motor development evaluation, the AIMS final scores resulted in normal (70%), suspect (20%) and atypical (10%) performance. A statistically significant association between final ISQ scores - Brazilian version with caregiver's age (p = 0.022) and Apgar scores at the fifth minute of life (p = 0.049); Final AIMS scores with gestational age (p = 0.013) and chronological age (p = 0.001). The final AIMS scores and final ISQ scores (Brazilian version) did not present statistical significance (p = 0.240). It was concluded that sleep behavior and gross motor development at the age of 12 to 18 months were not directly associated with most variables. However, it is emphasized that parental, environmental and organic factors are active determinants in this process, and this relationship with adequate sleep allows the brain activity to act in favor of development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".