MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043570683

Stochastic orebody modelling and stochastic long-term production sheduling for an iron ore deposit in Northern Quebec

2017· dissertation· en· W7043570683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Banach Space Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIron oreStochastic modellingProduction scheduleScheduleOpen-pit miningValuation (finance)Production (economics)Excavation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The process of mine planning, from prospection of orebody deposits defining its extension, location and value, until obtaining minerals and their extraction sequence in time, requires mathematical optimization to determine the size and grade (grades) of the deposit and finally define a proper mine schedule to obtain the maximum earnings from it, at the lowest possible cost, in order to fulfill the business targets. In general, a mining project passes through a set of stages in order to evaluate its viability. One of these stages is the "feasibility stage" where the gathered information from mining studies is used to determine the economics and practical aspects of the ore deposit. This identifies, early on, whether further investment in estimation and engineering studies are required, and identifies areas for further work and development. The KéMag iron ore deposit owned by New Millennium Limited in northern Quebec, Canada, is in feasibility stage. The KéMag iron ore deposit is a taconite type, where the iron content is present as finely dispersed magnetite between 20 and 35 % iron (Fe) in a sedimentary rock interlayered with quartz, chert, and carbonate. This thesis focuses on a set of methodologies to develop a whole process of stochastic orebody modelling and stochastic strategic mine planning for the KéMag deposit, aiming to generate a modelling and optimization methodology that integrates geological uncertainty and manages risk in the mine schedule. This mathematical framework has been successfully implemented in the last two decades allowing modelling and integration of geological uncertainty to mine design, production scheduling and valuation of mining projects. From the application, several cases have shown an increment on the value of the production schedules up to 25%, and a reduction of deviation from production targets from 9% to 0.2%. For the KéMag deposit a set of fifteen realizations of nine lithological units (layers) were simulated using WAVESIM which is a multiple point simulation method combined to an image compression procedure to allow faster simulations. The orebody simulations obtained through WAVESIM serve as geological boundaries to integrate the variability of the four grades of interest using DBMAFSIM this method allows the simulation of correlated variables directly at block support using min/max autocorrelation factors MAF. The final result is a series of equally probable representations of the deposit that incorporate both grade and tonnage uncertainty. These simulations of the KéMag deposit were validated in terms of histograms, variograms (low order statistics) and high-order statistics through 3rd order cumulants maps for the boundary limits only. Geological uncertainty can then, be managed by directly incorporating stochastic simulations within the mine scheduling framework. To achieve this, one flexible method for long-term production scheduling based on Stochastic Integer Programming (SIP) was applied with an acceleration methodology based on a heuristic algorithm called Topological Sort Algorithm (TSA) to reduce the computational time required to solve the problem of production scheduling. The result of the stochastic mine planning framework is a single schedule robust enough to account for geological uncertainty of the KéMag deposit giving valuable information for the conceptual stage of the project, in terms of silica content, iron production and expected cash flows per year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicAdvanced Banach Space TheoryFrench-language works237,207