MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043616565

Synergistic Effect of Gamma-Irradiation and Microencapsualted Anticrobials agaist Listeria Monocytogenes on Ready-to-Eat (RTE) Meat

2016· other· en· W7043616565 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada)) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersErasmus+International Atomic Energy AgencyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaComissão Nacional de Energia NuclearArmand-Frappier FoundationU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsNisinListeria monocytogenesAntimicrobialBacterial growthFood preservationVacuum packingListeriaBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focused on the antimicrobial efficiency of micro encapsulated nisin/essential oil (EO) nanocomposite bead systems against Listeria monocytogenesin ready-to-eat (RTE) meat for in situfood applications. For the evaluation of nisin/EO microbeads, a preliminary study in vitrowas undertaken to develop nisin/EO-microencapsulated edible beads in order to inhibit the growth of L. monocytogenes in RTE ham. Different concentrations of nisin (16, 31 and 63 μg/mL) were encapsulated into alginate-cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) beads. Microencapsulation kept the available nisin (63 μg/mL) content 20 times more than free nisin during 28 days of storage at 4 °C, by exhibiting 31 μg/mL of availability.Cooked ham slices were coated by nisin beads, inoculated with L. monocytogenes (3 log CFU/g) and stored at 4 °C under vacuum packaging for 28 days. The beads containing 16, 31 and 63 μg/mL of nisin significantly (P≤ 0.05) reduced the bacterial counts by 2.6, 1.5 and 3.0 log CFU/g after storage compared to free nisin, without changing the physicochemical properties (pH and color) of RTE ham. A second microencapsulation study was to compare oregano essential EO (Origanum compactum; 0.025% w/v), cinnamon EO (Cinnamomum cassia; 0.025%) and nisin (0.25% or 16 μg/mL), used alone or in combination with γ-irradiation, to evaluate their in situinhibiting capacity against the growth of L. monocytogenes in RTE ham. Microencapsulation of these formulations allowed verifying the potential of the polymer to protect their antimicrobial efficiency during storage time. Combined treatments of antimicrobial formulations with γ-irradiation were also carried out to determine synergistic antimicrobial effects. Microencapsulatedcinnamon EO/nisin combined with γ-irradiation (1.5 kGy) showed 0.03 log CFU/g/day growth rate of bacteria compared to 0.17 log CFU/g/day for non-encapsulated counterpart. Microencapsulation also showed a significant improvement of bacterial radiosentivity(P≤ 0.05). Microencapsulated oregano EO/nisin and cinnamon EO/nisin combinations showed the highest bacterial radiosensitization with relative sensitivities of 3.4 and 6.9 respectively. Finally, microencapsulation can protect the bioactivity of the antimicrobial compounds during irradiation and the both process act in synergy to eliminate pathogens in food.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada))French-language works237,207