Talking through the glosa: an examination of the conversational networks implicit to the glosa form
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Examining the potential for conversation between poets within the glosa, this work responds to the lack of critical treatment of the poetic form by opening up new avenues for consideration.In order to understand the role of conversation within a poem, this thesis parallels the glosa with the concept collaboration, the dramatic monologue, the pas de deux, the elegy and the dedication collection in contemporary Canadian writing.Through comparative analysis with these other forms, this thesis develops new understandings of the way in which lyric subjectivity can be conditioned by poly-vocal poetry.The study culminates in a collection of poems entitled, Songs of the Involuntary Night Choir, which further questions the relationships between poets and their social context, their readers and their peers and predecessors. RSUMEn recherchant les possibilits qu'offre l'tude de la conversation entre potes dans le glosa, cet ouvrage rpond l'absence de traitement scolaire de la forme potique en ouvrant de nouvelles avenues thoriques.Afin de comprendre le rle de la conversation dans un pome, ce mmoire met en parallle le glosa avec la collection collaborative, le monologue dramatique, le pas de deux, l'lgie et la collection de dvouement dans la littrature canadienne contemporaine.Grce une analyse comparative avec ces autres formes, ce mmoire dveloppe une nouvelle perspective quant la manire dont la subjectivit lyrique peut tre influence par la posie poly-vocale.L'tude aboutit un recueil de pomes intitul Songs of the Involuntary Night Choir qui approfondit l'examen des relations entre les potes et leur contexte social, leurs lecteurs, leurs contemporains et leurs prdcesseurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it