MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043670773

Tecnologia Tatil para Avaliacao da Dor em Cegos

2009· article· en· W7043670773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Interpretation (philosophy)Scale (ratio)Data collectionContent validityValidity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study general aims sits on the improvement, in the blind men co-partnership, and validation
\nof tactile technology for the pain evaluation. It looks for, in three phases, identifying the form and
\nthe tactile content to apply in the tactile Scale of the Pain (version 1); to improve them according
\nto the opinions of Brazilian and Canadian experts; and to apply the tactile technology in blind
\nwith pain history to analyze the tactile technology (Version 2A e 2B) reliability and analyze the
\nversions validity with the pattem criteria of the Numeric Scale.. The theoretical bases were
\nbased in the concept, mechanisms neuro physiological involved to the interpretation and
\ninstruments used for measure of the painful experience; in the elements of the communication
\nnon visual; and, concepts and relationships between technology and nursing. After seeming
\nfavorable of the Ethics Committee UFC/CE, the first phase of the research began, in November
\nof 2002, with the accomplishment of four Workshops to work the form and the content of the
\ntactile technology (version 1), with a group of blind ff the Association of the Blind men from
\nCeará (ACEC). In the first phase, the investigation participative was used to obtain data starting
\nfrom free interviews and observation participative, being registered in cassettes, photographed
\nand filmed with the participants' previous authorization. It was obtained two versions, to 2A and
\n2B, the first with texture in sandpapers and Monday in stairway format, both three-dimensional
\nones. The Workshops allowed the ransom of the citizenship as fundamental right to the use of
\nappropriate technology to the blind men reality. The second phase consisted of the application of
\nan open questionnaire to obtain the experts appreciation as the form, the content and the
\npotential of measure of the tactile technology, finishing the collection in July of 2003. It was
\nobtained suggestions of space placement among the textures of the version 2A, insert of a point
\nin high relief, indicating the beginning of the reading of the versions and, the use of the same
\nones in people without blindness. In the third phase, it was applied the versions in blind men with
\npain, before and after competitions happened during the World Olympics for Blind men (IBSA) in
\nAugust, in the city of Québec - Canada. It was used of the simple descriptive statistics for the
\ncharacterization of the sample and statistics non parametric, to compare the versions proposed
\nwith the Numeric Scale (EVA), being treated by the program ssps. The averages (M) and the
\nstandard deviation was calculated for each version and the test of reliability intraclass (ICC) it
\nshowed the version 2B more it approximates of the characteristics of the Numeric Scale
\nmeasure. The Pearson correlation (rs) allowed analysis of the scores, confirming the reliability of
\nthe versions. It was ended that, the version 2B approaches of EVA, it measure potential adapted

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicPain Management and Opioid UseFrench-language works237,207