MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043789854

UHPC Decked I-Beam for Accelerated Bridge Construction

2023· article· en· W7043789854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concreteFormworkBridge (graph theory)DurabilityService lifeSuperstructureBox girder
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) is an excellent material for bridge construction due to its exceptional durability and superior mechanical properties. Several Departments of Transportations (DOTs), including NDOT, have limited the use of UHPC in bridge construction to joints and connections between bridge components due to the relatively high materials cost of commercially UHPC products. Recently, NDOT has sponsored a research project to develop a non-proprietary UHPC using local materials to reduce materials cost and ensure its availability to local contractors and precast producers. The project was completed successfully and an economical UHPC mix that satisfied all workability, durability, and strength requirements was developed and tested. Therefore, it is economically feasible to expand the use of UHPC to bridge superstructure components that can have a service life of over 150 years. The objective of this project is to develop a UHPC superstructure system for bridges in Nebraska that is optimized with respect to structural efficiency, constructability, and economy. Several UHPC superstructure systems used in France, Korea, Malaysia, USA, and Canada including pi-girders, bulb-tee girders, tub girders, box girders, decked I-beams, and waffle slabs, were reviewed and evaluated to determine the system(s) that meet NDOT needs. A decked I-beam (DIB) section was selected due to its ease of production, constructability, and structural efficiency. Formwork design, production trials, and material/structural testing were conducted for UHPC DIB specimens with ribbed and solid slabs using pre-tensioning and post-tensioning systems. Design examples of a typical bridge using DIBs were also presented to demonstrate the implementation of the latest UHPC design specifications/guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicInnovative concrete reinforcement materialsFrench-language works237,207