MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043896616

Use of Noise Power Spectra (NPS) for quality control in digital radiography

2020· dissertation· en· W7043896616 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCancerCare Manitoba Foundation
KeywordsPixelNoise (video)Image qualityImage noiseDigital radiographyFixed-pattern noiseSpectral densityResidualDigital image
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quality control (QC) guidance documents recommend various tests for evaluation of different parameters of x ray imaging systems’ performance. QC tests can be time consuming, user-dependent and require specialized tools. The aim of this thesis is to investigate the noise power spectrum (NPS) as a QC constancy test which is simple, fast and lends itself easily to automated analysis. Uniform images were acquired under different conditions representing deviations from ideal performance using two digital x-ray systems. The stationarity and ergodicity of the noise was assessed. The normalized NPS (NNPS) were calculated using the methodology of the international electrotechnical commission. The total relative difference was used to quantify the changes in the NNPS. The NNPS was computed for images: with focal spot blooming, collected using large and small focal spot (to mimic resolution change), various tube voltage values, with and without defective pixels, with residual image and with a mismatched anti-scatter grid. Results showed that the NPS method is not sensitive to image lag and focal spot blooming investigated in this study. However, the NPS method was sensitive to changes in resolution introduced by changing the focal spot size, kV deviations as small as 1 kV, defective pixels representing 0.01% of the image pixel and 0.98 MSE difference from the original image, affixed pattern artifacts and a mismatched grid. The NPS was decomposed into its components (fixed pattern, quantum and electronic) to investigate the effect of different performance deviations on the NPS components. The negligibility of the electronic noise was verified. The results showed the fixed pattern changes impacted the fixed pattern NPS component the most and the changes associated with quantum noise affected the quantum component. This thesis suggests the NPS is sensitive to a variety of deviations in system parameters and performance metrics likely to arise in the quality control of digital radiography systems. NPS decomposition can further help identify the source of deviations. The NPS has the potential to be used as a constancy test for routine quality control of DR systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingFrench-language works237,207