Valuable Graphic Novels in the Swedish Classroom - Teaching Fundamental Values with Maus, Persepolis and Jannah in Upper Secondary School in Sweden
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Föreliggande uppsats syftar till att synliggöra hur tre uppslag ur serieromanerna Maus, Persepolis och Jannah, kan fungera som en utgångspunkt för gymnasieskolans värdegrundsuppdrag i svenskämnet. Studien bygger på en kvalitativ analys i tre steg: textuell, diskursiv och didaktisk. Analysen visar att samtliga verk innehåller diskurser som möjliggör etisk reflektion och samtal om värdegrundens innehåll. Maus demonstrerar förlust av handlingsutrymme, trygghet och tillhörighet under nazistisk förföljelse. Persepolis innehåller diskurser kring social kontroll och konformitet kontra individuellt självbestämmande i ett teokratiskt Iran. Jannah artikulerar motståndsdiskurser samtidigt som underliggande teman om övervakning och förlust av integritet synliggörs. Slutsatsen är att serieromaner kan fungera som värdefulla redskap i arbetet med gymnasieskolans demokrati- och värdegrundsuppdrag.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".