Two frontier churches. : A paper read before the Canadian Institute at Niagara, on the 2nd of July, 1890.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TWO FRONTIER CHURCHES.said, by Act of the Parliament which sat within sight of this spot, de- clared free long before Britain by many a hard fought struggle in the House of Commons made her chattels free, or our neighbors by the un- stinted pouring out of millions, and of a more costly treasure of tears and blood, did the same.The next entry tells of the time when this was the capital." Buried, an infant child of the Atty.-Gen.'s servant ; and Oct. ioth, R. B. Tickell buried," and the comment on some to us never to be explained tragedy, " Alas he was starved."" Sept. 24th, White, the butcher from England, and an Indian child."It is noticeable that the rector must have been indefatigable in his exertions, for we find him bap- tizing at 12 Mile Creek, 20 Mile Creek, 40 Mile Creek, Ancaster, Fort Erie, St. Catharines, Head of the Lake, Chippewa, Grantham, Falls, York, Long Point.On these occasions, and when people came from long distances to Niagara, there are often a great many baptisms recorded on the one day, the comment " of riper years " shewing many besides chil- dren were baptized.June 24th, 1799, occurs a well-known name." Baptism, Allan Napier McNabb, from York," as also occur the names of Ridout, Givens, Macaulay from the same place." Buried, , worn out by excess at the age of 49.Baptized, Amos Smith, of riper years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.090 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".