Vloga učitelja v izobraževalnem modelu demokratičnega izobraževanja
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Na začetku je krajši opis različnih vrst alternativnega izobraževanja, kamor spada tudi demokratično izobraževanje. Nato sledi poglavje, kjer so razvrščena različna pojmovanja demokracije in je predstavljeno, kam vse se uvrščajo demokratične, svobodne šole (Summerhill, Sudbury Valley School, Hadera, demokratična šola Sofija ipd.). V tretjem poglavju so opisane temeljne značilnosti demokratičnih šol in demokratičnega izobraževanja, nato pa sem se v osrednjem delu osredotočila na tri vidnejše demokratične šole in opis njihovega delovanja ter poglede na izobraževanje otrok in mladostnikov. V zadnjem poglavju teoretičnega dela sem pregledala možnosti za ustanovitev demokratične šole v Sloveniji. V empiričnem delu sem opisala delovanje in filozofijo demokratične šole Sofija in se osredotočila predvsem na vlogo učitelja, kot jo vidijo zaposleni na šoli. Zapis je nastal po številnih pogovorih z zaposlenimi in ravnateljico šole Magi Blagoevo, in sicer na podlagi moje šestmesečne prakse na demokratični šoli Sofija v študijskem letu 2019/2020.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".