MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044177286

Two lensed Lyman-a emitting galaxies at at z~ 5

2010· article· en· W7044177286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMax Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalaxyStarsStar formationGravitational lensPopulationStellar populationLuminosity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present observations of two strongly lensed z ~ 5 Lyman-α emitting galaxies that were discovered in the Sloan Giant Arcs Survey (SGAS). We identify the two sources as SGAS J091541+382655 at z = 5.200 and SGAS J134331+415455 at z = 4.994. We measure their AB magnitudes at (i, z) = (23.34 ± 0.09, 23.29 ± 0.13) mag and (i, z) = (23.78 ± 0.18, 24.24+0.18 –0.16) mag and the rest-frame equivalent widths of the Lyman-α emission at 25.3 ± 4.1 Ã… and 135.6 ± 20.3 Ã… for SGAS J091541+382655 and SGAS J134331+415455, respectively. Each source is strongly lensed by a massive galaxy cluster in the foreground, and the magnifications due to gravitational lensing are recovered from strong lens modeling of the foreground lensing potentials. We use the magnification to calculate the intrinsic, unlensed Lyman-α and UV continuum luminosities for both sources, as well as the implied star formation rates. We find SGAS J091541+382655 and SGAS J134341+415455 to be galaxies with (L Ly–α, L UV) <= (0.6 L* Ly–α, 2 L*UV) and (L Ly–α, L UV) = (0.5 L* Ly–α, 0.9 L*UV), respectively. Comparison of the spectral energy distributions of both sources against stellar population models produces estimates of the mass in young stars in each galaxy; we report an upper limit of M stars <= 7.9+3.7 –2.5 × 107 M sun h –1 0.7 for SGAS J091531+382655 and a range of viable masses for SGAS J134331+415455 of 2 × 108 M sun h –1 0.7< M stars < 6 × 109 M sun h –1 0.7. Based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States), the Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom), the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian Research Council (Australia), Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia (Brazil) and Ministerio de Ciencia, TecnologÃa e Innovación Productiva (Argentina), and the Apache Point Observatory 3.5 m telescope, which is owned and operated by the Astrophysical Research Consortium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it