MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044197496

Usporedba depresivnoga i demoralizacijskoga sindroma kao predskazatelja suicidalnosti u kroničnoj fazi shizofrenije

2014· dissertation· en· W7044197496 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the Medical Faculty of the University of Zagreb (University of Zagreb) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrelationScale (ratio)PopulationTest (biology)Statistical analysisWilcoxon signed-rank test
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of depression and demoralization syndromes \non suicidality in patients with chronic schizophrenia. \nMethods: A prospective study on 146 out-patients with chronic schizophrenia, treated in \nPsychiatric University Hospital “Vrapče”, Zagreb, Croatia, from April 15th 2011 to June 1st \n2013. Every patient’s schizophrenia diagnosis was independently made by two psychiatrists, \nusing ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria. Sociodemographic, clinical and hospital data were \ncollected for every patient. Severity of their symptoms was assessed with the Positive and \nNegative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), \nthe InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking (ISST) and the self-administered Demoralization \nScale (DS). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square, Wilcoxon test and \nMcNemar test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were calculated to identify and test the \nstrength of relationship between scores on used scales while the multiple regression model \nwas used to test multivariate predictive models of suicidality. \nResults: The statistically significant positive correlations were found between patient’s \ndemoralization categories and their male sex, number of previous hospitalizations (second \ntest), hereditary of suicidality, CDSS score, ISST score and scores on cognitive, affective and \nnegative factors of the PANSS. \nThe statistically significant positive correlation were found between patient’s depression \ncategories and their heredity of suicidality, number of previous hospitalizations, DS score, as \nwell as scores of cognitive, affective and negative factors of the PANSS. \nSuicidality had statistically significant positive correlation with patient’s male sex, heredity of \nsuicidality, number of previous hospitalizations, DS score, CDSS score and scores of \ncognitive, affective and negative factors of the PANSS. \nIn the multiple regression model, two initial predictive variables had statistically significant \nassociation with suicidality: DS score and score of affective factor of the PANSS. In second \ntest, two predictive variables showed statistically significant association with suicidality: DS \nscore and CDSS score. Demoralization was stronger predictor than depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of the Medical Faculty of the University of Zagreb (University of Zagreb)Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207