VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS FROM AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smog events continue to occur in Southern Ontario and maximum ground level ozone concentrations exceed the Canada Wide Standard (CWS). Ontario’s automotive manufacturing sector, while perceived as a significant contributor to volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions (an ozone precursor) at 10 kt per year, contributes only 1.5% of Ontario’s 649 kt annual emissions. Canada’s current VOC guideline for automotive surface coating for new facilities at 55 g/m2 is higher than Europe’s new standard at 45 g/m2 or Germany’s at 35 g/m2. However, Canada’s VOC guideline for automotive surface coating for existing facilities at 55 g/m2 is lower than Europe’s standard at 60 g/m2. Canadian auto manufacturers have made significant reductions since the early 1990’s and are now achieving VOC emissions on average of approximately 36 g/m2. General Motors (GM) new paint shop for its Oshawa Car Plant is expected to achieve VOC emissions of approximately 15 g/m2 in 2006. Therefore, it can be concluded that through a combination of voluntary (Ontario’s Anti Smog Action Plan - ASAP), regulatory (air permitting) and corporate initiatives (emission reduction objectives and common paint shop designs), Ontario’s automotive manufacturers are achieving VOC emission performance found in the most stringent European jurisdiction (Germany), and with new installations (i.e. GM Oshawa Car) will approach the performance of US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Best Available Control Technology (BACT) standards. Considering the above, it is recommended that the Ontario Ministry of the Environment should continue with its current approach of using the ASAP program and air permitting to control VOC emissions from Ontario’s automotive manufacturers. It is also recommended that the Ministry of the Environment consider, in consultation and cooperation with the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) and the automotive manufacturing sector in Ontario, updating the New Source Performance Standards and Guidelines for the Reduction of VOC Emissions from Canadian Automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) Coating Facilities to reflect the current performance of the Ontario automotive manufacturing sector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".