Will private health insurance schemes subscriptions continue after the\nintroduction of National Health Insurance in Uganda?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction:\tUganda is currently designing a National Health\nInsurance (NHI) scheme, with the aim of raising additional resources\nfor the health sector. Very little was known about the health insurance\nmarket in Uganda before this study, so one of our main objectives was\nto investigate the nature of the private health insurance market in\nUganda and the opinions of various stakeholders on NHI, with the view\nto establish the impact of NHI implementation on the existing PHI.\nSpecifically, we aimed to gather the opinions of employees and\nemployers on the likely impact of NHI on their PHI schemes. Methods: \nWe conducted interviews with health insurance providers, and a sample\nof employers and employees in Kampala, using structured questionnaires\nand analysed quantitative data using STATA8. Qualitative data was\nanalysed through grouping of emerging themes. Community-based health\ninsurances were excluded from the study. Results: Health insurance\nand/or prepayment schemes are offered by a handful of organisations or\nprivate health providers, mainly in Kampala and cover a relatively\nsmall percentage of Uganda's population. The premiums charged and the\nbenefit packages offered by the different agencies vary widely. There\nare 2 health insurance agencies, 2 HMOs and about 5 or more private\nproviders offering pre-payment schemes to their patients. Responses\nfrom a significant proportion of employers and employees show that PHI\nschemes may be abandoned once the mandatory NHI scheme is implemented.\nA few respondents argued that they would maintain their PHI\nsubscriptions because of their perceptions of the quality of services\nlikely to be provided under the NHI scheme. Conclusion: If\nsuccessfully introduced, the NHI scheme may displace existing private\nhealth insurance and/or pre-payment schemes in Uganda. The extent to\nwhich PHI schemes are displaced depends on whether NHI is successfully\nimplemented and the quality of services being offered under the NHI\nscheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".