Vivències de supervivents d'una aturada cardiorespiratòria extra-hospitalària del Baix Empordà - un estudi qualitatiu: projecte de recerca
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases due to primary cardiac causes are the \nleading cause of cardiac arrest and the leading cause of death worldwide for 15 \nyears. Cardiac arrest mostly occurs at an extra-hospital level and its survival rate \nremains low, especially in the long term. After cardiac arrest patients spend one \nyear for a cardiac rehabilitation, however, the literature shows that this is \ninsufficient because patients continue to suffer from long-term consequences \nsuch as depression, anxiety, panic, insecurity and loss of abilities. Today, \nhowever, there has been little research into the experiences and support needs \nin this stage. \n \nAim: To know the experiences after the cardiac arrest of the survivors of an extra- \nhospital cardiac arrest in the Baix Empordà region. \n \nMethodology: The study presents a generic qualitative methodology; it is of the \ninterpretative type and it will be carried out from September 2018 to October \n2019. The field of study is the community nursing of the basic areas of health \nfrom the Baix Empordà region. The study population will be adults over 18 years \nold of the Baix Empordà region who have survived an extra-hospital cardiac \narrest. The initial sample will be of 8 survivors chosen for convenience after \nmaking informative sheets to the consultations of primary health care centres and \nhealth clinics of the Baix Empordà. The data will be collected through a depth \nsemi-structured interview and a thematic content analysis will be carried out. To \ncarry out the study, it will be passed through the Research Committee and the \nconfidentiality and autonomy of the patient will be respect according to the law. \nPractical implications: The results of the study could help nursing, especially \ncommunity, to know the main needs, fears, limitations and challenges and, thus, \nto give more comprehensive, complete and person-centred care through nursing \nconsultations or home visits
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".