MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044576860

急诊科护士述情障碍与其职业倦怠的相关性研究

2021· other· zh· W7044576860 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLanzhou University Institutional Repository · 2021
Typeother
Languagezh
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaWork (physics)Relation (database)Burnout
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的分析急诊科护士述情障碍与职业倦怠的相关性,探讨急诊科护士述情障碍对职业倦怠的影响。方法采用一般资料调查表、多伦多述情障碍量表(20-item Toronto alexithymia scale,TAS-20)和Maslach职业倦怠量表(Maslach burnout iaventorygeneral suruey,MBI-GS)对5省市22所医院急诊科护士进行问卷调查,采用分层回归分析探讨急诊科护士述情障碍对职业倦怠的影响。结果共调查464名急诊科护士,21.6%(100人)存在述情障碍,45.0%(209人)存在可疑述情障碍。Pearson相关分析显示,急诊科护士述情障碍各因子得分与职业倦怠各因子得分均呈显著正相关(均P<0.01)。分层回归分析显示,情感识别障碍和外向型思维为急诊科护士职业倦怠的危险因素。结论急诊科护士述情障碍问题突出,述情障碍与职业倦怠呈正相关关系,护理管理者可通过提供针对性的述情障碍干预措施以缓解急诊科护士职业倦怠状况。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanzhou University Institutional RepositorySame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207