MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044591087

이전가격과세제도의 국제적 추이 분석과 정책적 시사점

2003· book· en· W7044591087 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKorea Institute of Public Finance Research Publications (Korea Institute of Public Finance) · 2003
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Taxation and Avoidance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsTransfer pricingMultinational corporationOutsourcingForeign direct investmentKey (lock)Tax policyHome marketPricing strategies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the global economy recovers for the recent years, tax authorities of many governments struggle to tax multinational enterprises which are increasingly outsourcing back office services and moving munufacturing facilities to countries with lighter tax regimes. Especially, Korea suffers from increasing excess of outbound FDI over inbound FDI even in manufacturing industry for the past 4 years. Each country’s transfer pricing rule, which the tax administration establish how multinationals allocate costs and profits between national subsidiaries, tends to be globally harmonized with the need to recipricity principle. In this report, fourteen basic Transfer Pricing cases are analysed in the history of how the U.S. IRC Section 482 has been evolved. Especially we examine which economic method (ex. CUP, RPM, CPM, etc.) of determining arm's length price was critical in each key legal cases. We also analyse the formation of OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines in terms of economic approach to arm's length price. With the understanding of these U.S. and OECD history of Transfer Pricing practice, we explore the policy suggestion to Korean Transfer Pricing Taxation. Major findings of this report is as follows: 1) The concept of ALP cannot be perfect competitive equilibrium price in economics sense. The various methods of determining transfer price could be best understood as the reasonable way of deriving hypothetical prices under the specific terms and conditions of transactions. 2) U.S. courts tends to settle down with the compromised solution. Especially, the expert opinions based on professional economic analyses in the existing and new transfer pricing methodologies become auxiliary, and courts take the approach of ‘Your guess is not better than mine’. 3) With the issue of OECD transfer price guidelines in 1995, the arm's length principle was emphasized as the undisputed starting point when dealing with the tax effects of transfer pricing, as was a transactional approaches the preferred application. Especially, the OECD in its concern to match approaches to transfer pricing in different parts of the world went so far as to create a new method called ‘the transactional net margin method’ (TNMM) that resulted from the conversion of the US testing approach to a price setting method. ,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1030.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKorea Institute of Public Finance Research Publications (Korea Institute of Public Finance)Same topicCorporate Taxation and AvoidanceFrench-language works237,207