고려수지요법이 여성노인의 무릎통증과 우울에 미치는 영향
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of Koryo hand moxibustion therapy on female elders′knee pain and depression. This is an quasi-experiment with nonequivalent control group throuh pre-and post test design. Data collection and treatment were conducted from August 3 through October 21, 2009. \n The subjects were 60 female elders in a hospital for the elderly in D city. Allocately, 20 elders were selected for the experimental group A by using Ceramic Seo Am pellet therapy, 20 for the experimental group B by using Seo Am moxa therapy and 20 for the control group. Two different kind of method were used and three times per week for 6 weeks(total of 18 times) interventions were carried out. \n In order to measure knee pain, Bellamy's Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index Score(WOMAC) revised by Bae, et. al., (2001) was adopted. The Simplified elders′ depression scale was used to measure the depression level of the elderly. The scale was first invented by Yesavage in 1986 , and revised by Song mi-sun in 1991, and Shin dong-soo in 1996. The data was analyzed by -test, One-way ANOVA, Repeated measure ANOVA and Simple main effect with SPSS Win 12.0 program. \n The results of this study were as follows : \n 1. Hypothesis 1 was supported by the fact that "knee pain of both the experimental group A provided with Ceramic Seo Am pellet therapy and the experimental group B provided with Seo Am moxa therapy was lowered than that of the control group" (F = 15.81, p<.001). \n 2. Hypothesis 2 was supported by the fact that "depression of the experimental group A provided with Ceramic Seo Am pellet therapy and the experimental group B provided with Ceramic Seo Am moxa therapy was lowered than that of the control group" (F=9.53, p<.001). \n In conclusion, Koryo hand moxibustion therapy was to be effective in relieving female elders' knee pain and depression and it is suggested that the therapy should be used for managing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".