MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7045114964

Analysis of amensalistic bacteria biocontrol models

2009· dissertation· en· W7045114964 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsVolkswagen FoundationAdvanced Foods and Materials Network
KeywordsBiofilmChemostatPopulationContext (archaeology)Reaction–diffusion systemOrdinary differential equationVariable (mathematics)Control variable
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a mathematical model for growth and control of facultative anaerobic bacterial biofilms in the context of an amensalistic microbial systems. The growth of the microbial population is limited by protonated acids and the local pH value, which in return are altered as the microbial population changes. The process is described by a system of five coupled non-linear differential equations for the dependent variables biomass densities, acid concentration, pH and malate. We present an extensive model in chemostat format of this bio control model and study the effect of initial values and flow rate for the dynamics of pathogens and control agent. Using a nonlinear master equation a diffusion-reaction model for biofilms is derived. The equation for bacterial biomass shows two non-linear diffusion effects, a power law degeneracy as the dependent variable vanishes and a singularity in the diffusion coefficient as the dependent variable approaches its a priori known threshold. The interaction of both effects describes the spatial spreading of the biofilm. The interface between regions where the solution is positive and where it vanishes is the biofilm/bulk interface. We adapt a numerical method to explicitly track this interface in 'x-t' space, based on the weak formulation of the biofilm model in a moving mesh frame. Morever we present numerical simulations of the spatio-temporal amensalistic biofilm model, applied to a probiotic biofilm control scenario. An existence of solution and 2D simulation was carried out in appendix B for dual species setup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→