MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7045342997

Ab initio calculation of atomic ground state energies using the in-medium similarity renormalization group

2019· dissertation· en· W7045342997 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenormalizationAb initioHamiltonian (control theory)Ground stateRenormalization groupSimilarity (geometry)Matrix elementBasis (linear algebra)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computational many-body physics presents one of the most difficult challenges for theoretical physics.In order to solve many-body physics problems, we consider several choices of basis functions, and describe how to determine matrix elements in each basis for the atomic Hamiltonian evolved in the In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group.Our results demonstrate that the Laguerre basis functions demonstrate an excellent basis, and we are able to calculate ground state energies of several Noble gases with extreme precision.The results of this research can further be built upon to create a tool for prediction of both nuclear and atomic physics properties ab initio. 1 Abstrait Résoudre un problème à N corps s'avère être un des plus grands défis en physique théorique.Pour résoudre un tel problème, nous considérons plusieurs choix de fonctions de base et décrivons comment déterminer les éléments de l'Hamiltonien de l'atome dans chaque base après que celles-ci aient été évoluées à l'aide du "In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group".Nos résultats montrent que la base des fonctions de Laguerre est un excellent choix.De plus, nous avons pu calculer l'énergie de l'état fondamental de plusieurs gas nobles avec une très grande précision.Les résultats de cette recherche peuvent servir d'assise pour la création d'un outil pouvant prédire tant les propriétés nucléaires qu'atomiques ab initio.7.12 Hartree-Fock and IM-SRG calculations of the ground state of krypton as a function of the truncation parameter, E max , and the length parameter, b.Dark blue indicates E max =2, cyan is E max =4, increasing in increments of 2, with purple being the highest at E max =12. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57 7.13 Hartree-Fock and IM-SRG calculations of the ground state of xenon as a function of the truncation parameter, E max , and the length parameter, b.Dark blue indicates E max =2, cyan is E max =4, increasing in increments of 2, with purple being the highest at E max =12. . . . . . . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→