Artificial intelligence driven decision-making under uncertainty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decision-making is a fundamental problem in the modern world.Technology has developed to a level where automated decision-making is used even in safety-critical systems such as self-driving cars and industrial gas turbines.The design and operation of such systems often requires decision-making without full-knowledge or information, i.e., decision-making under uncertainty.Uncertainty can manifest itself in many ways.Notable examples include non-reliable and/or delayed information.This thesis investigates methods to advance and improve the reliability of artificial intelligence led decision-making systems under these forms of uncertainty.This thesis covers both sequential decision-making and predictive systems.These are investigated on the backdrop of two industrial application spaces: food retail and cyber-physical systems.First, this thesis develops novel algorithms for multi-armed bandits and sequential decision-making.We present the first practical computation and indexing method for the optimal policy for Bernoulli multi-armed bandits, which was previously considered intractable for several decades.Furthermore, we provide the optimal policy for Bernoulli bandits with delayed decision outcomes.We benchmark and gauge existing popular algorithms and showcase how performance deteriorates significantly in the presence of delay.We then generalize the concepts to non-Bernoulli distributions with delay.To exploit sequential decision-making in a practical application, we build a simulator to serve as a sandbox for experimentation to reduce food waste in food retail.We present a flexible framework capable of simulating a variety of food retail entities and their interactions.Each entity is controllable by reinforcement learning agents.We demonstrate how combining simulation with reinforcement learning can effectively reduce food waste and increase profits relative to a baseline.Finally, the thesis investigates and provides methodologies for building more robust predictive systems in the presence of information uncertainty.Many industrial problems require decision-making with limited information or potentially unreliable information.In collaboration with Siemens Energy as industrial partner, we develop machine learning predictors used for designing aeroderivative gas turbines as complex cyber-physical systems.We also provide a methodology for deploying such machine learning predictors to existing resource-constrained control hardware.In conclusion, this thesis provides novel decision-making techniques for various forms of uncertainty by exploiting both theoretical and practical results across different application domains.prise de dcision avec des informations limites ou potentiellement peu fiables.En collaboration avec Siemens Energy comme partenaire industriel, nous dveloppons des prdicteurs d'apprentissage automatique utiliss pour concevoir des turbines gaz arodrives en tant que systmes cyber-physiques complexes.Nous fournissons galement une mthodologie pour le dploiement de ces prdicteurs d'apprentissage automatique dans le matriel de contrle ressources limites existant.En conclusion, cette thse fournit de nouvelles techniques de prise de dcision pour diverses formes d'incertitude en exploitant les rsultats thoriques et pratiques dans diffrents domaines d'application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".