MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045640502

Artificial intelligence driven decision-making under uncertainty

2024· dissertation· en· W7045640502 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReinforcement Learning in Robotics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsExpert systemApplications of artificial intelligenceKey (lock)Artificial neural networkFeature (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decision-making is a fundamental problem in the modern world.Technology has developed to a level where automated decision-making is used even in safety-critical systems such as self-driving cars and industrial gas turbines.The design and operation of such systems often requires decision-making without full-knowledge or information, i.e., decision-making under uncertainty.Uncertainty can manifest itself in many ways.Notable examples include non-reliable and/or delayed information.This thesis investigates methods to advance and improve the reliability of artificial intelligence led decision-making systems under these forms of uncertainty.This thesis covers both sequential decision-making and predictive systems.These are investigated on the backdrop of two industrial application spaces: food retail and cyber-physical systems.First, this thesis develops novel algorithms for multi-armed bandits and sequential decision-making.We present the first practical computation and indexing method for the optimal policy for Bernoulli multi-armed bandits, which was previously considered intractable for several decades.Furthermore, we provide the optimal policy for Bernoulli bandits with delayed decision outcomes.We benchmark and gauge existing popular algorithms and showcase how performance deteriorates significantly in the presence of delay.We then generalize the concepts to non-Bernoulli distributions with delay.To exploit sequential decision-making in a practical application, we build a simulator to serve as a sandbox for experimentation to reduce food waste in food retail.We present a flexible framework capable of simulating a variety of food retail entities and their interactions.Each entity is controllable by reinforcement learning agents.We demonstrate how combining simulation with reinforcement learning can effectively reduce food waste and increase profits relative to a baseline.Finally, the thesis investigates and provides methodologies for building more robust predictive systems in the presence of information uncertainty.Many industrial problems require decision-making with limited information or potentially unreliable information.In collaboration with Siemens Energy as industrial partner, we develop machine learning predictors used for designing aeroderivative gas turbines as complex cyber-physical systems.We also provide a methodology for deploying such machine learning predictors to existing resource-constrained control hardware.In conclusion, this thesis provides novel decision-making techniques for various forms of uncertainty by exploiting both theoretical and practical results across different application domains.prise de dcision avec des informations limites ou potentiellement peu fiables.En collaboration avec Siemens Energy comme partenaire industriel, nous dveloppons des prdicteurs d'apprentissage automatique utiliss pour concevoir des turbines gaz arodrives en tant que systmes cyber-physiques complexes.Nous fournissons galement une mthodologie pour le dploiement de ces prdicteurs d'apprentissage automatique dans le matriel de contrle ressources limites existant.En conclusion, cette thse fournit de nouvelles techniques de prise de dcision pour diverses formes d'incertitude en exploitant les rsultats thoriques et pratiques dans diffrents domaines d'application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicReinforcement Learning in RoboticsFrench-language works237,207