BI-IM: “+I” IS FOR INTEGRATED \nWHOLE BUILDING MODEL, RESEARCH APPROACH AND COLLABORATIVE METHODS DEALING WITH INDUSTRIAL CASES: AIRPORTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The seminar is part of an agreement on cultural and scientific cooperation existing \nbetween the University of Florence and the ETS - Ecole Superior de Technologie, \nMontreal (Quebec) Canada. The topics covered include the parametric design and \nmethodologies and tools for integrated planning in particular at airports. In particular, \nit covers topics such as: the difficulty in achieving the objectives of sustainability, which characterize current practices, which show low productivity and predictability , \nas well as inadequate quality of the final product design. The proposed BIM Committee and the state of the art in this field. Then examles will be introduced. \nAfterwards there will be a study on the situation in Europe and specifically in Italy. \nThe seminar also provides an introduction to integrated design followed by a \nsession of Integrated Design Workshop. At the end of the workshop the students \npresent and discuss the work, confronting the criteria proposed in front of an \ninterdisciplinary committee. Student teams is interdisciplinary, formed by \narchitecture students, engineering students and specialists \nare targeted to share in the project team the concept of integration, to obtain an \nimprovement of the development process. \nIn addition, the approach will be contextualized within Lean Design integrated \nmethodologies using instrumentation technology for building information modeling. \nBIM is presented as the solution to many problems of the industry. The large public \nclients worldwide require delivery of projects based on parametric models; in the UK \nLOD (Level Of Definition) 2 is compulsory since years, the European directive will \nmake procurement practices harmonic throughout the EU. However for a successful \nuse of BIM, described as a revolutionary technology, it requires a radical change in \ndesign paradigms. The seminar introduces the concepts of BIM and OPEN BIM and \nhas its impact on the evolution of practices in the world. These aspects will also be \ncorrelated with the life cycle of the project by introducing the innovative concept of \nBI-IM (Integrated Building Information Modeling). Finally, the thematic seminar will \nprovide the opportunity for an interdisciplinary debate on how these trends impact \narchitectural design. AIA (American Institute of Architects) created a committee in \n2005 to monitor the impact of BIM on design practices. The situation was summed \nup with the phrase "adopt or die"; however, the Higher Education and Research in \nArchitecture, Engineering and Construction have poorly developed methodologies to \nprepare the younger generation to be the leaders of change in this industry that is \nundergoing a deep transformation. The first seminar presents the work of the AIA BIM Committee and the state of the art in this field. Examles are introduced. \nAfterwards there is a study on the situation in Europe and specifically in Italy. \nThe seminar also provides an introduction to integrated design followed by a \nsession of Integrated Design Workshop. At the end of the workshop the students \npresent and discuss the work, confronting the criteria proposed in front of an \ninterdisciplinary committee. Student teams are interdisciplinary, formed by \narchitecture students, engineering students and specialists
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".