Bibliographic record
Abstract
The volumes in the present series deal with "The Celtic Englishes" and explore the linguistic outcome of the (historical as well as contemporary) contact between the English language and the indigenous languages of the British Isles and Ireland, i.e. the Insular Celtic languages such as Irish (Gaelic), Scottish Gaelic, Manx (Gaelic), Welsh, Cornish and, by extension, Breton. These form the native languages of the so-called "inner colonies" of England (Hechter) and provided the basis for the rise of the "Celtic Englishes" during and after the shift of the population from their Celitc source languages to English as their target language over a number of centuries. The "Celtic Englishes" were also transported to the "outer colonies," notably to North America (USA and Canada), Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and, by Irish missionary activities in the 19th and 20th c., West Africa. The contributions to this series of volumes explore the different types of the "Celtic Englishes" from various linguitic perspectives (phonological, grammatical, lexical; synchronic, diachronic; diastratic; etc.). The methodologies used also vary between traditional dialectological approaches, philology, structuralism, functional linguistics, corpus analysis, typology and universal grammar. Because of its advanced analycity, the typological separation of Middle English from the other Germanic languages is also explored and the question raised whether the English language as such does not have to be considered as the outcome of language contact between the native Britons, who spoke varieties of the Brittonic branch of the Celtic languages and who shifted to English during the three or four centuries after the Anglo-Saxon Conquest. Volume four is to appear in 2006. See: http://www.celtic-englishes.de/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.187 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".