MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7045787992

The Challenge of Ownership in the Communal Management of Natural Resources by the Local Political Decision Makers and of Gender Mainstreaming: The Case of Protected Areas in Senegal

2011· article· en· W7045787992 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité Cheikh Anta Diop de DakarInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsDecreeNatural resourceNatural resource managementLivelihoodWork (physics)PoliticsEmpowermentInstitutionResource management (computing)Local government
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"To cope with ecological, socio-economical and demographical changes, the rural populations in Senegal have tried to combat the degradation of their environment by promoting some local adaptation strategies. Indeed, in several areas, the populations have taken the initiative of restricting some inter-village forestry and pastoral land ranges to exploitation, so as to protect, conserve and use them to cater to their various needs. These local management measures are not, in most cases, taken into account by the rural council which is the local institution mandated for the management of the natural resources by virtue of Decree No. 96-1134 as of December 27th 1996. The Decree addresses the implementation of the act of law relative to the transfer of authority to the provinces, communes and rural communities with respect to the management of the environment and of natural resources. Most of the local representatives are more concerned with the other functions rather than those related to natural resource management. Yet, the populations they represent earn their livelihood mainly from the exploitation of the available natural resources. This work examines the difficulties the populations face so as to succeed socially and above all benefit properly from the favorable socio-economic consequences of these protected areas in the absence of any external support. On the basis of a socio-economic, organizational, and institutional evaluation as well as gender-based studies that considered situations with or without any external support, we pay close attention to local mechanisms of support to the populations with communal local initiatives; to empowerment of the local decision-making representatives in charge of the environment; to dialogue between communities and local stakeholders; and to the level of creativity in mobilizing the required financial resources."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0340.037
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University)Same topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207