MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7045936593

Comparison of the EU and US experiences with respect to controlling emissions from high emitting vehicles

2004· report· en· W7045936593 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuropean unionWork (physics)Greenhouse gasProduction (economics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major air pollutants emitted from road traffic -petrol and diesel vehicles -are nitrogen oxides, particles, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and different toxic substance, e.g.heavy metals and polycyclic hydrocarbons.Several measures have been taken in Europe as well as in the US, Canada, Japan and other countries to address these emissions.The measures included emissions limit values (discussed in case study 1 and 4) and improved fuel quality (discussed in case study 1 and 4).The emissions of pollutants from new vehicles have been reduced significantly within the last 20 years.The largest improvements were obtained through the introduction of three-way catalysts on petrol cars including lead free petrol, reduced sulphur in diesel and petrol fuel, engine technology and different methods (e.g.filters) to reduce particle emissions.A small fraction of the car fleet accounts for a large share of the emissions in many countries.A number of approaches have been undertaken to address emissions from these "high emitting" vehicles.We considered two specific approaches-inspection and maintenance (I/M) and vehicle scrappage programmes.&203$5,621 2) 7+( 7:2 $3352$&+( 6Below we briefly describe the efforts of the EU-15 and US to address these high emitting vehicles through I/M and scrappage programmes.Greater details on the legislation adopted and regulation implemented in the EU-15 and US is discussed in Annex II and III, respectively, to this section.(8 0HPEHU 6WDWHV DUH UHVSRQVLEOH WR GHYHORS QDWLRQDO UHJXODWLRQV WKDW PHHW WKH 5RDGZRUWKLQHVV )UDPHZRUN 'LUHFWLYH The Roadworthiness Framework Directive was first implemented in 1977 and updated several times, latest in 1996.The directive includes safety as well as air emissions, and covered in the first versions only commercial vehicles, but now also private vehicles.These programmes require compulsory vehicle inspection to ensure that the vehicle owner has done the necessary maintenance in order for the emission control system to function properly.Testing must be conducted at least every two years once the vehicle is four years old.Most Member States test more frequently.The Roadworthiness Framework Directive has followed up with Directive 2000/30/EC on "The technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Community", which gives possibilities for roadside inspections.The latest Directive 2003/26/EC of 3 April 2003 "adapting to technical progress Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards speed limiters and exhaust emissions of commercial vehicles" include possibilities for use of OBD (On Board Diagnostic) as an alternative to the tests, provided a proper function of the OBD systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→