Computational methodologies for solid tumor characterization and outcome prediction in volumetric medical images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imaging-based quantification and characterization of tumor phenotypes has been the main goal of numerous efforts in recent years for developing and integrating precision oncology in clinical practice.Identifying optimal quantitative image features and machine learning pipelines for computer-aided diagnosis constitute crucial steps towards the development of reproducible, standardized, and clinically relevant imaging biomarkers of cancer phenotypic characteristics.An "image feature" can be understood as an image-derived descriptor of intensity, shape, texture, etc.In radiomics studies, the main hypothesis is that combining many of these quantitative features extracted from tumor regions in medical images can predict underlying genetic or pathological changes occurring in response to disease activity.Given the high variability of processing pipelines in radiomics studies, we first aimed to develop and validate a standardized, IBSI-compliant, and evidence-based processing pipeline for radiomics studies.Second, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the well-established robust set of rotationally invariant features from spherical harmonics (SPHARM) decompositions in predicting outcomes from volumetric medical images and compare it to radiomics.Pipelines for these two methods were built and validated on synthetic 3D texture datasets and in two distinct dual-centre diagnostic retrospective studies: i) a study on identifying renal cysts malignancy on contrast-enhanced CT, and ii) a study on identifying histopathological features of endometrial cancer on multi-parametric MRI.For distinguishing benign from malignant renal cysts, a random forest model based on a set of five most discriminative and reproducible radiomics features resulted in high diagnostic performance (testing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.91).Similarly, for SPHARM decomposition coefficients, a tensor logistic regressor resulted in good diagnostic performance for predicting malignancy of renal cysts (testing AUC = 0.83).For detecting histopathological deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer on multi-parametric MRI, a random forest model based on our set of five most discriminative and reproducible radiomics features resulted in good diagnostic performance (testing AUC = 0.81).For SPHARM decomposition coefficients, a tensor logistic regressor resulted in higher diagnostic performance using only dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI images (testing AUC = 0.86).Furthermore, we ABSTRACT ii show that in specific situations, approximate spherical tumor segmentations can rival or even outperform painstakingly obtained but accurate tumor segmentations.Both radiomics features and SPHARM descriptors show promise as reproducible surrogate biomarkers of histopathological features of cancer activity on CT and MRI.Implementing such computational pipelines in clinical practice could improve and accelerate patients' stratification and decision-making for radiologists and radio-oncologists in cancer diagnosis or treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".