MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046277448

Comparing interhemispheric differences of mesosphere/lower thermosphere dynamics from ground-based observations and three general circulation models

2021· other· en· W7046277448 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venueelib (German Aerospace Center) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeteor (satellite)ThermosphereNorthern HemisphereSouthern HemisphereGeneral Circulation ModelRadarLatitudeMesosphereMeteoroidGravity wave
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meteor radars have been proven to be valuable assets in investigating and monitoring mesosphere/lower thermosphere winds for the last two decades. In this study we present a comparison of almost continuous meteor radar measurements obtained from six meteor radars located at mid- and polar conjugate latitudes in both hemispheres. For this purpose we havecompiled harmonized data sets for the Sodankylä (67.9°N, 21.1°E), Esrange (67.4°N, 26.6°E), Davis (68.6°S, 78.0°E), Collm (51.3°N, 13.0°E), Tierra del Fuego meteor radar (53.7°S, 67.7°W) and the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar (CMOR) (43.3°N, 80.8°W). The analysis revealed characteristic differences between the northern and southern hemisphere in the mean winds, in the strength of the mesospheric jets as well as in the tidal climatologies. In particular, semidiurnal tides show significant and distinct interhemispheric differences, notably a strong seasonal asymmetry in amplitude and phase, most prominent during the hemispheric fall transition from September to November. We also compared the observational climatologies with predictions from the three general circulation models GAIA, WACCM-X(SD) and ICON-UA. The model data were analyzed by simulating the radar in the model domain and applying an identical diagnostic to extract mean winds, tides and gravity wave activity. Our comparison reveals substantial differences between model and observational mean winds and tides that vary seasonally, by model and hemisphere. GAIA indicates similar winds during the hemispheric winter conditions compared to the observations, whereas WACCM-X(SD) showed a better agreement to the observations for the summer zonal wind reversal. The models are only partially able to capture interhemispheric differences, with the free-running ICON-UA model best reproducing the interhemispheric difference of the semidiurnal tide in reasonable agreement to observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueelib (German Aerospace Center)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207