MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046575939

Distribución Espacial y Evaluación de La Ocurrencia de Aluviones, Cuenca del Río San Juan, Provincia de San Juan, Argentina

2023· article· es· W7046575939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueConicet · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoison controlNova scotiaRegional studies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo tiene como objetivo determinar la distribución espacial y las características de las zonas propensas a la ocurrencia dealuviones. Se logró a través de un análisis morfométrico regional, inventario de depósitos de aluviones, evaluación de mapas temáticos derivados de un Modelo Digital de Elevación, y el cálculo de densidad de Kernel. La cuenca del río San Juan presenta una superficie de 38147 km2, abarcando casi en su totalidad el desarrollo las actividades humanas de la provincia. Debido al carácter regionaldel estudio, se dividió en cuatro subcuencas para la obtención de un mayor detalle. A partir de los resultados, se deduce el caráctertorrencial de la cuenca, estimando que las condiciones del terreno contribuirían a incrementar el flujo de la corriente de los ríos principales, ante la ocurrencia de intensas precipitaciones. Los depósitos de aluviones están establecidos principalmente en terrenos pocorugosos con pendientes de hasta 16°, distribuidos mayormente en zonas de media ladera y bajada pedemontana orientadas al este; yzonas bajas de llanuras de inundación de los ríos o áreas planas. Constituyendo las mismas, evidencia sobre rutas e infraestructuras,comprometiendo directamente e indirectamente las actividades humanas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConicetSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207