MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7046600664

Effects of simulated climate change on post-disturbance «Populus tremuloides - Picea mariana» ecosystems in northwestern Quebec

2009· other· en· W7046600664 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrowing seasonClimate changeEcosystemBiomass (ecology)Black sprucePrecipitationForest ecologySpring (device)ThinningTranspirationJuniper
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the mixedwood-boreal transitional forest of northwestern Quebec, the establishment of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) has been observed at the extremes of their regional distribution, in areas previously dominated by black spruce (Picea mariana (Miller) BSP). Our main objective was to explore how climate change could affect the growth and performance of aspen and black spruce. Climate change simulation was provided by the installation of twenty open-top chambers (OTCs) and twenty control plots in the summer of 2005 at three disturbed sites (post-fire, logging road and logging). Each plot enclosed a pair of aspen and spruce seedlings. In comparison to control plots, the conditions in the OTCs were marked by higher air temperatures (2-3°C), drier soil (up to 10% volumetric moisture content) and cooler soil (up to 2.6°C), lower supply rates of Ca and Mg, and slower decomposition of aspen litter. Warm weather and high rainfall were likely responsible for increased height growth and advanced spring bud burst of aspen growing in the OTCs during the 2006 growing season, but not during the cooler and drier season of 2007. Leaf calcium concentration was higher, and beetle leaf herbivory was lower for OTC aspen in comparison to control plot aspen. Spruce was not affected by OTC treatment in terms of height growth, but its final dry biomass was higher, and spring bud burst was advanced by 2-3 days in the OTCs compared to control plots. Both species showed trends of higher root tip number and lower % ectomycorrhizae (ECM) colonization in the OTCs, and vice versa in the control plots. Aspen appeared to be more dependent on ECM colonization; therefore, potential ef

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research→French-language works237,207→