MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046731864

Discovery and Biochemical Characterization of New CAZymes from PULs and Metagenome Sequences

2017· dissertation· en· W7046731864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXyloseHemicelluloseGlycoside hydrolaseXylanMetagenomicsEsteraseArabinoxylanEnzyme
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(methyl)-Glucuronoxylan, a main hemicellulose in hardwood trees, has a broad range of potential applications, ranging from biofuels to bio-based coatings and packaging films. It is substituted with (methyl)glucuronic ((Me)GlcpA) and acetic acids, which affect polymer solubility, rheology, interaction with other polymers, and accessibility of the polymer to enzymes. To date, there are no known esterases that are able to deacetylate internal xylose residues that are both 3-O-acetylated and 2-O substituted with (Me)GlcpA (Xyl-3-Ac-2MeGlcpA). In this study a protein of unknown function, which was named FjoAcXE, was produced and characterized to be an acetyl xylan esterase capable of deacetylating xylose residues at all positions, including Xyl-3-Ac-2MeGlcpA. Additionally, FjoAcXE was shown to display synergism with α-glucuronidases from glycoside hydrolase (GH) 67 and GH115 families. Synergistic action between FjoAcXE with α-glucuronidases was further tested with three recombinantly produced α-glucuronidases from metagenomic sequences of the Canadian beaver (Castor Canadensis) droppings enriched on poplar hydrolysate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207