MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7046942783

The Effect of Face Topography on Frostbite

2019· other· en· W7046942783 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeCommons (Cornell University) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrostbiteAirflowConvectionFace (sociological concept)Cold weatherSkin temperatureFront (military)Thunderstorm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Winters in most countries within the Northern hemisphere, which include heavily populated regions of Russia, Canada, China, and the United States, are commonly known to be harsh, unforgiving, and unpredictable. Cold weather injuries such as frostbite can occur within only a few minutes of exposure to extremely cold temperatures and high wind chill. We seek to provide a quantitative model of the effects of extremely cold and freezing temperature on the face and the extent of damage to tissue over time. In this study, our model will take into account the airflow of cold temperature on the face and the convective heat given off by the face. Using the duo model, we will be able to show the severity of tissue damaged. In this study, we consider both the tissue temperature on the face and the temperature of the airflow. To investigate the mechanism of forced convection heat extraction in the face, we will use COMSOL, a multiphysics finite element analysis and simulation software, to develop a simple geometry of the face and replicate the heat exchanging properties when exposed to extreme temperature conditions. Our model will be a 3D simulation of the face with boundary conditions a close distance away from the face. We are primarily focused on simulating that the airflow is coming directly in front of the face and that is where the primary damage will occur. We will use the data provided by the National Weather Service that demonstrates how quickly hypothermia and frostbite can occur depending on the windchill and temperature. The model will demonstrate the extent of damage that can occur in varied temperature settings. It will simulate how long the body can retain thermal energy while convective heat loss is simultaneously occurring. This model will allow us to demonstrate the importance of preventative care during extreme temperature conditions to avoid frostbite. It will allow us to quantitatively demonstrate how much tissue is damaged to help diagnose and treat frostbite cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeCommons (Cornell University)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207