Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Çalışmamıza, Marmara Üniversitesi Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim\nDalı Tedavi Ünitesinde, el osteoartriti (OA) tanısı konmuş 30 hasta ve üst \nekstremitesinden hiçbir şikayeti olmayan 30 sağlıklı kadın olgu alınmıştır. Olgular \neklem hareket genişliği, kas gücü, kavrama ve çimdikleme kuvveti, AUSCAN el OA \nindeksi (The Australian/Canadian hand OA index) testlerindeki fonksiyonel \nyetenekleri açısından değerlendirilmişlerdir. Osteoartritli olgulara ek olarak \nwhirpool, su içi ultrason ve TENS'den oluşan fizik tedavi programı ve aktif, aktif \nyardımlı egzersizlerden oluşan rehabilitasyon programı 15 seans uygulanmıştır. \nTedavi sonunda OA'lı hasta grubu uygulanan tedavinin etkinliğini görmek amacı ile \nyeniden değerlendirilmiştir.\nÇalışmamızda OA'lı olgular ile sağlıklı olgular arasında, OA'lı olguların \ntedavi öncesi ve sonrası değerleri arasında, eklem hareket genişligi, kas gücü, \nkavrama ve çimdikleme kuvveti, AUSCAN skorları açısından istatistiksel olarak \nanlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Osteoartritli olguların tedavi sonrası \nkuvvet ölçümleri ve AUSCAN indeksindeki yetenekleri artmış olmasına rağmen \nsağlıklı olgular ile karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı yetersizlikler tespit \nedilmiştir (p<0.05).\nSonuç olarak, OA'lı olguların fizik tedavi rehabilitasyon programlarının yanı \nsıra, iş ve uğraşı tedavisi ünitelerinden de yararlanmaları sağlanmalıdır. Uygun \nzamanda ve hastaya özel olarak planlanmış rehabilitatif yaklaşımlar, eklemleri \nkoruyucu ve günlük yaşam aktivitelerini kolaylaştırıcı ergonomik düzenlemeler, \nhastanın ağrısını, başkalarına bağımlılığını ve toplumsal ekonomik kayıpları önemli \noranda azaltacaktır. Hastalığın tedavisi ile uğraşan ekibin bu konuda bilgi sahibi \nolması, muhtemel disabiliteyi önleyecektir.\n\n\nHAND OSTEOARTHRITIS AND DISABILITY\nSUMMARY\nWe included 30 female patients with hand osteoarthritis and 30 healthy \nwomen who have no upper extremity problems in The Physical Therapy Unit of \nPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department at Marmara University School of \nMedicine. The two groups were evaluated with range of motion, muscle strength, \nPinch and grip strength, and functional ability scores in AUSCAN (The \nAustralian/Canadian) OA hand Index. Patients with hand osteoarthritis received \nwhirlpool, ultrasound in water, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), \nactive and active assisted exercises program for 15 sessions. This group was \nevaluated at the end of the treatment to see the efficacy of treatment program.\n\tIn the beginning and at the end of the study we found statistically significant \ndifferences between the two groups and within the first group for range of motion, \nmuscle strength, grip and pinch strength and success of AUSCAN Index parameters \n(p<0.05). At the end of the study, muscle strength and ability test in AUSCAN Index \nwas increased in the first group with hand osteoarthritis; but when we compare the \nfirst group with the second group, which has no upper extremity problems we found \nstatistically significant differences for disabilities (p<0.05).\n\tIn conclusion, we believe that addition of occupational therapy to physical \ntherapy is necessary in patients with hand osteoarthritis. Special rehabilitation \nprograms designed for individual patients and at the correct time, ergonomic designs \nfor joint protection and daily life activities are necessary to decrease pain, dependence \nand preventing economical losses; also increasing the knowledge of the treatment \nteam on this subject could prevent possible disability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.674 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it