MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7047231532

FACTORS AFFECTING THE CHANGE IN PATIENT PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENT-CENTRED CARE OVER TIME

2008· article· en· W7047231532 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecallPerceptionAffect (linguistics)Test (biology)CognitionHealth carePrimary careMEDLINE
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The relationship between patient-centred care and health outcomes is important to the development of quality primary care practices. A systematic review of studies that investigated this relationship (since 2000) was conducted to summarize the effects of patient-centred care. Moreover, this review found that the timing of implementing patient-perceived patient-centred care measures relative to the patient­ physician interaction in question varied from five days to one year and studies capturing these recalled perceptions did not report on the impact of the timing of measurement, which threatened the validity of their results. Over such varied elapsed time periods, patients’ perceptions of the patient-centred care they received from an earlier time point are likely subject to change. Inadequate account of changes in patient perceptions over time may have been in part due to insufficient research on factors affecting recall of patient-centred care. Objective: To determine the factors that affect changes in patient perceptions of patient-centred care over time using a conceptual framework derived from the cognitive psychologie literature. Methods: Secondary analysis of patients (n = 315) visiting family physicians (n = 39) practicing in Southwestern Ontario. Patient perception scores of patient-centred care collected at Tl (immediately following the visit) and at T2 (approximately two months later asking patients to recall the patient-centredness of their visit at Tl) both using the 14-item PPPC allowed for the study of change in patient perceptions over time. Analysis: ANCOVA was used on a sample of 253 patients from 32 physicians to test three main hypothesized effects: (1) elapsed time, (2) post-Tl health visits, and (3) change in symptom discomfort on change in patient perceptions from Tl to T2, controlling for clustering and additional covariates. Results: The main effects were not significantly related to changes in patient perceptions; however, among the covariates, patients’ who perceived more negatively of their health at T2 and were more anxious at Tl had a significantly greater change in their perceptions. Conclusions: Studies implementing patient perception measures later in time relative to the patient-physician interaction in question should consider the potential for the above-mentioned factors to impact changes in patients’ perceptions of patient-centred care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology→French-language works237,207→