Feminist Collections, v.20, no.4 (summer 1999)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FROM THE EDITORS. BOOK REVIEW: In Touch With the Moon, by Elaine Wheeler. RESEARCH EXCHANGE: A new column. FEMINIST VISIONS: Experimental Films by Women, by Marilyn Gottschalk. UNTAMED SHREW: A sketch of Joan Hyer's book search service. NEWS FROM UW-EAU CLAIRE: By Sarah Harder. NEW REFERENCE WORKS IN WOMEN'S STUDIES: Three bibliographies on women and literature and two on women's sports, plus new sources on Latin American women, men who batter, women's personal writings, Hollywood images of working women, and women's organizations worldwide. PERIODICAL NOTES: New periodicals on African women, disabled women, education, history, Jean Rhys, maternal health, work and family, Tanzanian women, Canadian women, and market surveys. Special issues on Armenian women, television, cognitive-behavior therapy, Olive Senior, sati (widow immolation), and nineteenth-century clothing production. Transitions: Plainswoman temporarily suspends publication; Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy appears in a new format. Ceased publication: The Celibate Woman. ITEMS OF NOTE: A report on Title IX; legal information on sexual harassment; a clearinghouse on campus violence; a poster series on rape myths; an out-of-print book dealer; Routledge's new feminist book series; a collection of articles on disabled women; and a guide to starting a small business. BOOKS RECENTLY RECEIVED. SUPPLEMENT: INDEX TO FEMINIST COLLECTIONS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.248 | 0.120 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".