Featuring Gregory M. Nixon’s Work with Commentaries & Responses. HOLLOWS OF MEMORY. From Individual Consciousness \nto Panexperientialism and Beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Table of Contents \n \nArticle \nPreface/Introduction \nGregory M. Nixon 213-215 \nFrom Panexperientialism to Conscious Experience: The Continuum of Experience \nGregory M. Nixon 216-233 \nHollows of Experience \nGregory M. Nixon 234-288 \nMyth and Mind: The Origin of Human Consciousness in the Discovery of the Sacred \nGregory M. Nixon 289-337 \n………………………………………………………………………………………………….. \nCommentary \nBrief Comment on Gregory Nixon’s Hollows of Experience: Derrida \nFrederick D. Abraham 338-341 \nPlaying With Your Food: Review of “Hollows of Experience” by Greg Nixon \nWilliam A. Adams 342-345 \nBrief Commentary on Nixon's Three Papers \nRoger Cook 346-347 \nCommentary on Nixon's From Panexperientialism to Individual Self Consciousness \nStephen Deiss 348-349 \nNixon on Conscious and Non-conscious Experience \nGordon Globus 350-351 \nCommentary on Nixon's From Panexperientialism to Individual Self Consciousness \nSyamala Hari 352-353 \nThe Predictive Mind and Mortal Knowledge \nMarc Hersch 354-368 \nConsciousness as Shared and Categorized Result of Experience \nTim Jarvilehto 369-371 \nBrief Comment on Gregory Nixon’s Myth and Mind \nJoseph McCard 372-372 \nCommentary on Nixon's Three Papers \nMarty Monteiro 373-376 \nBrief Commentary on Nixon's “From Panexperientialism to Conscious Experience” \nRichard W Moodey 377-378 \nHollows of a Science of Consciousness? \nAlfredo Pereira Jr. 379-380 \nComment on Gregory Nixon’s “From Panexperientialism to Individual Self Consciousness” \nSteven M. Rosen 381-382 \nConsciousness, Non-conscious Experiences and Functions, Proto-experiences and Protofunctions, \nand Subjective Experiences \nRam L. P. Vimal 383-389 \n………………………………………………………………………………………………….. \nResponse to Commentary \nResponse to the Commentary of Frederick D. Abraham \nGregory M. Nixon 390-390 \nResponse to the Commentary of William A. Adams \nGregory M. Nixon 391-392 \nResponse to the Commentary of Syamala Hari \nGregory M. Nixon 393-394 \nResponse to the Commentary of Marc Hersch \nGregory M. Nixon 395-398 \nResponse to the Commentary of Joseph McCard \nGregory M. Nixon 399-399 \nResponse to the Commentary of Steven M. Rosen \nGregory M. Nixon 400-401
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".