MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047567920

Gendering international student mobility: an Indian case study

2013· dissertation· en· W7047567920 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSussex Research Online (University of Sussex) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNexus (standard)ScholarshipEthnographyContext (archaeology)DialecticEmpirical researchPower (physics)Value (mathematics)Agency (philosophy)Everyday lifePopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores the dialectical relationship between gender and
\ninternational student mobility (ISM). The focus is on the experiences of Indian
\nstudents across three space-time locations: before the students left India; while
\nabroad in Toronto; and their return to New Delhi. The value of this research is
\ntwo-fold. Firstly, my research helps to fill the lacuna in ISM research that
\nexamines the phenomenon through a gender optic. Secondly, there is
\nincreasing interest in Canada and other countries – evident in the media and
\ngovernment policy – in international students from India.
\nThe study is located at the nexus of gender and mobility scholarship; it adopts
\nGendered Geographies of Power as a foundational framework. The research
\nemployed a multi-sited, mixed-methods approach to data collection. The data
\ncollection in the field sites of Toronto, Canada and New Delhi, India consisted of
\nin-depth semi-structured interviews and participant observations. An online
\nsurvey was mounted for the duration of the fieldwork to gather data on the
\nbroader population of Indian students abroad. The results of this survey provide
\ncontext for the discussion in three empirical chapters.
\nThe first of the three empirical chapters explores the impact of gender relations
\nin shaping motivations to study abroad. The second chapter examines how
\nrelations of power in and across multiple spaces (re)shape the students‟
\nperformances of gender identities in everyday life in Toronto. The final
\nempirical chapter examines the students‟ experience of return mobility as they
\nattempt to adapt to a different (but familiar) gender context again.
\nMy research contributes to the growing body of scholarship on ISM as well as
\nthat on gender and migration. By employing a gendered perspective, the indepth
\ninterviews as well as ethnographic research reveals the shifting
\nsubjectivities of the migrants as they simultaneously negotiate multiple ethnic
\nand kinship interactions in their everyday lived experiences. Secondly, the
\nonline survey presents the gendered class configurations of the socio-economic
\nbackground of the Indian international students. Lastly, the „return‟ experiences
\nof the students are differentiated by gender: more women than men found it
\nharder to (re)negotiate their gender-expected performances in New Delhi.
\nFurthermore, the „return mobility‟ of men appears to be more permanent than
\nthe return mobility of women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it