MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7047596617

The Home is a Place for Living: Fifteen Conversations About Inhabitation, Adaptation, and the Rehabilitation of Toronto’s Post-War Apartment Buildings

2021· dissertation· en· W7047596617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedevelopmentApartmentCognitive dissonanceNarrativePopulationAgency (philosophy)ArchitectureMisrepresentationLiminalityBuilt environment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toronto is home to one of North America’s largest stock of postwar residential towers, which house nearly a million people in over a thousand towers across the GTHA. Built throughout the postwar population and economic boom of the 1960s for an emerging middle class, these modernist structures have become the defining typology of the city’s most isolated and inaccessible suburbs. Now thirty years past their intended lifespan, Toronto’s ageing towers currently house a majority of the city’s low-income residents in isolated, dilapidated complexes estranged from the city-at-large. Working alongside research conducted by the Tower Renewal Partnership, a cross-professional effort spearheaded by ERA Architects, this thesis explores how the architectural revitalization of these sites can help facilitate adaptable, self-sufficient neighbourhoods that prioritize notions of tenant ownership and agency within oftentimes hostile, inherited environments. \nPost-war, low-income housing developments are subjected to narratives of seemingly inevitable cycles of decline and demolition; the towers’ physical deterioration serving as a misrepresentation of actual daily life within these sites. These misrepresentations contribute to feelings of resident alienation and disempowerment, further exacerbating the physical degeneration of many of these tower neighbourhoods. Through interviews with residents, conversations with key community advocates, and typological site analysis, this research presents a methodology for revitalization. In environments where the scale of the architecture often overwhelms ideas of individual desire and agency, this research explores how to mediate the dissonance between hyper-density and the realities of domestic life. Through the renegotiation of previously overlooked spatial thresholds—balconies, corridors, and empty parking lots—the project examines how these liminal spaces can serve as a tool for user appropriation and activation. Using North York’s Falstaff Towers as a testing ground for architectures of agency, this thesis investigates how a series of key design interventions can help reconnect Toronto’s post-war towers on two scales: that of the resident and that of the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0300.026
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→