MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047746171

Interrogating Trans (in)visibility: A collective case study of school-based mental health provision and access for trans and gender-diverse youth in Ontario.

2024· article· en· W7047746171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSuperconducting Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthMiddle Eastern Mental Health Issues & SyndromesInstitutionalisationPerspective (graphical)Field (mathematics)Mental health lawQualitative research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This qualitative collective case study investigates the impacts of cissexism on the provision of and access to school-based mental health support for trans and gender diverse youth. The study draws on Trans Studies and Foucauldian analytic frameworks to examine how cissexism operates across mental health policy, research, and practice to constitute trans and gender-diverse youth as subjects within the field of school-based mental health. A conceptual framework of (in)visibility is utilized to account for the ways in which trans and gender-diverse youth are simultaneously made intelligible as a result of experiencing mental health stress and/or gender dysphoria, while their other mental health needs are obscured or just conflated with other comorbidities. Through employing mind mapping and interviews with both school-based mental health practitioners and trans/gender diverse students in schools, I examine the relationship between the production of knowledge within the field of school based mental health and how it informs practices of mental health support and impacts student access. Two forms of knowledge, institutional and community informed, emerged as important influences which shaped how practitioners identified and engaged with cissexism in their work. The accounts of trans and gender-diverse youth offer a much needed triangulated and trans desubjugated perspective on the administration of and access to mental health support which further exposes the extent of the institutionalization of cissexism in the school system and also documents their hopes for a school-based mental health system which meets their needs. The findings reveal the need for the integration of intersectional and decolonial frameworks in the school based mental health field which has implications for improving both pre- and in-service practitioner training. Overall, the study highlights the importance of recognizing the full range of mental health needs that trans and gender-diverse youth have beyond the limited discourses of gender dysphoria and minority stress which currently dominate the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)Same topicSuperconducting Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207