Incidencia del liderazgo directivo en la promoción del vínculo Docente- Estudiante como un Factor asociado a la calidad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This investigation seeks to recognize the impact the board of directives has in the enhancement between the teacher-student interaction as a factor directly associated to quality. The study was performed under a mixed scope of Recurring Triangulation Design (DIATRIC). The information was collected through the application of three standardized instruments based on the tool: Classroom Assessment Scoring System (known as CLASS), surveys performed on students from 5th to 6th grade from the school Colegio Campestre San Diego and the bilingual school José Max León, observations, and an instrument of self-reflection for the teachers who are currently leading learning processes with the selected groups of students. Aside from this, a focal group was developed for teachers and educational leaders taking the Ontario Leadership Frame. The instruments were applied to sample 63 students, 42 teachers, and 16 directives. The results found reveal that the teaching staff from both institutions, demonstrate interest to establish a relevant emotional support, which is perceived by the students, as well as the disposition to build spaces for dialogue, structure a positive environment within the classroom, and establish pedagogical moments that invite students to participate with ease. Nevertheless, evidence found indicates that teachers require constant companionship in educational training that leads to the enhancement of the teacher-student interaction. For that reason, a flexible education training plan is designed within a digital environment and through the development of individual learning routes surrounding four dimensions (come closer and know them, surprise, discover and support yourself) provides tools to fulfil students´ expectations and specific needs. The study shows that the school leaders promote the teacher-student interaction through the creation of a school environment that involves trust, warmth, openness to dialogue, and the demonstration of genuine interest for the teachers´ needs and inquiries. In that same way, the results of the investigation show the importance of the directives practices oriented to the companionship in the pedagogical processes that are developed within the classrooms, aside from facilitating encounters for the construction of a collaborative culture among teachers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".