Implementing safety management systems in aviation: The legal impact on Canadian commercial air carriers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In light of several major aviation accidents at the end of the 20th Century, Canadaâs interest in protecting the travelling publicâs safety has shifted towards the analysis of organizational factors to increase the industryâs safety. With the recent advent of Safety Management Systems (SMS) brought by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), air carriers registered in Canada are now required by law to manage the impact of their business decisions on their operationâs levels of safety. Firstly, the purpose of this thesis is to objectively understand safety management theories, and secondly, analyze the legal framework imposed on Canadian carriers operating under SMS. Subsequent chapters will adopt a critical analysis of the legal and practical difficulties encountered by Canadian operators during their transition to SMS. It will also discuss the legal challenges in protecting SMS information from being disclosed in the public domain or during civil proceedings. This treatise on SMS will explore the potential benefits and eventual shortcomings that may arise in certain areas of the law once this innovative safety regime becomes fully operational worldwide. Although SMS can effectively reduce safety risks with proactive responses to industry hazards, there is a compelling need to evaluate current deficiencies that may impact the effectiveness of this regime in reducing the number of accidents. Since Canada is the first country in the entire international aviation community to adopt and implement SMS, this thesis will bring forward legal solutions that could prevent ICAO member States from experiencing the difficulties encountered by several Canadian airlines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".