MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048191252

Laundrybar / Siti Nurbahiah Adenan

2022· other· en· W7048191252 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaundryProduct (mathematics)Work (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)ElectricitySWOT analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LaundryBar is a local company which is focusing on the laundry service. In this company analysis, it is focusing on the machine that used for laundry equipment such as washing machine, dryer and ironers. The SWOT analysis has been conduct for this company where it has been investigate, identified and analysed along with their current problem and come out with solutions. The first problem of the product is extra labor in handling quarter. As we know, the uses of quarter is bit complicated because it need a more time for owner or operator of laundry bar to handle it. This is because the laundry washing machine still rely on the coin operated system. This system is give a more work to the owner because they need to always go to the bank for exchanging the quarter if the quarter is missing or not enough. Therefore, this product also involving to the electricity where it use a high consumption of electricity to make the washing work done quickly. This will give a burden to the owner because the bill or cost of the laundry business will become higher. Then, the product also do not contain a temperature guide for washing clothes. Aside from that, there are a few solution that has been analyse to improve the product. There are three solution has been taken to overcome this problem which is changing the coin operated mechanism to smart paying, apply eco mode to the washing machine and increase the selection for temperature setting. All of the solution are considered to make the company producing a way quality product that to be served to their customer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1790.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207