Les aspirations chez les jeunes de classe populaire en formation dans les entreprises d'insertion au Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse le poids des facteurs sociaux et \nculturels sur la construction et l’évolution des aspirations \nsocioprofessionnelles. En particulier, nous nous concentrons \nsur les jeunes en formation dans les entreprises \nd’insertion et identifi ons les mécanismes et les eff ets de \nfacteurs tels que l’origine sociale pour voir comment ils \npeuvent déterminer les aspirations et deuxièmement, \ncomment ces aspirations peuvent devenir des moyens de \nreproduction sociale. \nNous nous intéressons aussi à l’évolution au fi l du \nparcours dans les entreprises d’insertion : est-ce \nqu’une réussite du parcours d’insertion peut permettre \nd`atténuer l’eff et premier de l’origine et de la classe \nsociale sur la construction des aspirations et, surtout, \nde quelle façon? Par ailleurs, nous nous penchons sur \nl’eff et d’une expérience positive sur le développement de \nla confi ance en soi et de l’estime de soi, et à l’amélioration \npossible des aspirations scolaires et professionnelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".