MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048256365

A JUVENILE CORYTHOSAUR (LAMBEOSAURINAE) FROM THE WAPITI FORMATION OF WESTERN ALBERTA, CANADA

2018· article· en· W7048256365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrestJuvenileCretaceousOutcropRange (aeronautics)Principal component analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Wapiti Formation (WF) spans some 12 million years (~79–67 Ma), equivalent to the famed dinosaur-bearing beds of the Belly River and Edmonton groups in southern Alberta. Unlike these units, the WF preserves a continuous terrestrial record filling major gaps left by marine transgressions (e.g., Bearpaw Formation). The WF, therefore, provides important insights into macroevolutionary dynamics during the Late Cretaceous and, given the inferred high paleolatitudes for this region, faunal interchange with its southern counterparts. Despite these obvious incentives, collecting and prospecting in the WF are hampered by the restriction of surface outcrops to river valleys and it is only recently that we are beginning to uncover the faunal diversity of these deposits. Here we present the first lambeosaurine from the WF, found in the Bearpaw-equivalent Unit 3. Discovered in 2017 along the northern bank of the Wapiti River, the skeleton preserves a number of features that permit taxonomic evaluation, despite its juvenile state. The cranial anatomy, specifically the crest, reveals a bifurcated nasal, typical of both Corythosaurus and Hypacrosaurus but not Lambeosaurus. Diagnostic characters of the former genera are difficult to assess in juveniles, but the anteriorly straight to convex lacrimal and the <140° crest angle are more typical of Corythosaurus. Assessment of growth in the crest angle among contemporaneous lambeosaurines (N=52) places the WF specimen outside the range of variation of Hypacrosaurus and within the trajectories of Corythosaurus and Lambeosaurus. A broader multivariate analysis based on a principal component analysis of 12 cranial measurements reveals that crest angle is a major driver of size-independent variation among these taxa and similarly places the WF specimen among Corythosaurus variants. Corythosaurus is well-known from the lower, sandy strata of the Dinosaur Park Formation (DPF). Its discovery in Bearpaw-equivalent deposits extends its temporal range to ~74– 73.4 Ma and suggests that taxa along the Corythosaurus lineage may have dispersed north, likely tracking environmental changes resulting from the major transgression of the Western Interior Seaway that covered southeastern Alberta during this time. Rates of lambeosaurine evolution, inferred from the DPF, and certain crest characters suggest it is unlikely that the WF Corythosaurus pertains to one of the known species. However, owing in large part to its juvenile state, the specific affinities of the WF Corythosaurus remain uncertain at this time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207