MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048268398

Landfarming of petroleum hydrocarbons, development and evaluation of methods to monitor their impact on the atmosphere

2001· dissertation· en· W7048268398 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefineryTrace gasSampling (signal processing)Soil gasAtmosphere (unit)Flux (metallurgy)Soil waterContaminationInterception
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emission of trace gases during refinery and bioremediation landfarming is investigated in this dissertation. Field and lab-scale methods were developed and used to quantify emissions and evaluate their impact. A flux gradient and aerodynamic mass balance micrometeorological method are described in detail along with measured total hydrocarbon (THC) and CO2 fluxes collected during measurements at 2 active refinery landfarms in Ontario. The methods worked well and allowed the unobtrusive real-time measurement of fluxes during the spreading of oily liquid wastes and dewatered biosolids, and during cultivating of the landfarm surface. Static chamber methods were developed and used to measure trace gas fluxes from a remotely located diesel-fuel contaminated soil landfarm. A modified static chamber method measured THC fluxes in real-time. Data could be collected in 10 minutes or less, minimizing the influence of the chamber's presence on the measured fluxes. Experiments were successfully performed to characterize landfarm emissions and to evaluate the impact of cultivation on emissions. A mesocosm-scale simulator facility was designed and constructed to measure trace gas fluxes from contaminated soils in real-time. Five simulators were integrated with a data acquisition system and trace gas analyzers; allowing automated sampling and calculation of THC, CO2 and water vapour fluxes. N2O fluxes were calculated using a discrete sampling method. Experiments were performed to evaluate the impact of simulated cultivation and rainfall on trace gas fluxes. Fluxes measured using the simulators were similar in magnitude to field results and effects observed during field studies were reproduced. Results from the conducted studies are used to assess the impact of landfarm emissions and recommend strategies for mitigation of emissions. A Gaussian areal source dispersion model was used to estimate airborne concentrations of hydrocarbons. Maximum concentrations were found to occur on the downwind edge of the landfarms. Maximum concentrations were at least an order of magnitude smaller than published exposure limit values for specific hydrocarbons, suggesting a minimal inhalation risk to humans. Recommendations are provided for landfarm operators to aid in minimization of volatile emissions while maintaining soil conditions for waste reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207