La réactivité du cortisol salivaire de sujets souffrant de dépression majeure exposés à des stimuli émotifs et neutres /
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'auteur a accord une licence non exclusive permettant la Bibliothque et Archives Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public par tlcommunication ou par l'Internet, prter, distribuer et vendre des thses partout dans le monde, des fins commerciales ou autres, sur support microforme, papier, lectronique et/ou autres formats.L'auteur conserve la proprit du droit d'auteur et des droits moraux qui protge cette thse.Ni la thse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent tre imprims ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation.Conformment la loi canadienne sur la protection de la vie prive, quelques formulaires secondaires ont t enlevs de cette thse.Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant.La ractivit du cortisol salivaire est observe chez les sujets dprims en phase active en condition d'apprentissage de mots neutres.Ces rsultats peuvent s'expliquer par un effet de congruence au schma cognitif. SummaryThe goal of the present study was to measure the reactivity of the salivary cortisol in depressed patients and controls exposed to emotional and neutral memory tasks.We recruited 21 depressed patients, 9 in an active phase of depression, 12 in remission and 17 controls.The 3 groups were similar.The proto col consisted of a task to assess explicit memory in two separate conditions: neutral and emotional words to learn consciously on two separate days.During both assessments, we took salivary samples each 10 minutes to assess the concentration of free cortisol before, during and after the memory task.A repeated analysis of variance was performed on the results of the memory task m two conditions for the 3 groups.An interaction was found between memory performance, conditions and the group [F (4, 64) = 3.053; P = 0.023].Depressed subjects recalled less words than controls in the neutral condition at the tree different recall periods.The performance of the 3 groups were similar in term of the number of emotional words recalled.An analysis of variance was performed with the repeated measures of cortisol.We found an interaction between the group and the condition [F(I,36) = 5.542; P = 0.024].We observed a cortisol reactivity among depressed subjects after the memory task in the neutral condition.The reactivity in the emotional condition didn't show such variability in this group.In conclusion, we observed a mood congruency effect in the memory task.Interestingly, the performance was similar for the 3 groups in the emotional condition
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".