MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7048464309

Les connaissances des internes de médecine générale de la région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes sur les entorses de cheville : une étude transversale descriptive

2024· dissertation· en· W7048464309 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnkleClinical PracticeSyndesmosisGeneral practicePhysical examinationSports medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Ankle sprains are the most common musculoskeletal injury. More than 6000 ankle sprains are diagnosed every day in France, which represent around 950.000 per year. Despite the fact that ankle sprains are commonplace, they are associated with significant morbidity, with almost 40% of cases complicated by chronic instability, and within that group, 20% are victims of premature talocrural osteoarthritis. Studies led on General Practitioners show room for improvement with poorly applied recommendation. No study has been carried out on the knowledge of General Practice interns in the Auvergne Rhône Alpes region about ankle sprains, which could be handled differently from their elders. Objective: Get an overview of the knowledge General Practice interns about ankle sprains and their management. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study with collection of responses of a questionnaire containing theoretical questions and two clinical cases, and ending with a self-assessment. Results: 97 questionnaires were received, of which 71 were complete across the Auvergne Rhône-Alpes region. The mean score obtained for the "Theory" section was 82,5/100. Clinical case n°1 on external sprains received an average score of 53,0/100. Clinical case n°2 on syndesmosis sprains received an average score of 28,9/100. Discussion: Interns in the region seem to have a good understanding of the anatomy and pathophysiology of lateral sprains. However, injuries to the distal Tibio-Fibular joint are less known, during the interview but also during clinical examination or when additional imaging are requested. Nevertheless, this did not have a proportional impact on immediate management. These results are consistent with the literature, which shows a real under-diagnosis. Their feeling of competence was mitigated. It’s particularly true with regard to the syndesmosis’ clinical case. The vast majority of interns questioned wanted further training on this subject. Conclusion: Ankle sprains are a frequent injury and are linked to a high morbidity. Lesions can be complex due to the multitude of structures involved and the variety of mechanisms. They are one of the types of injuries that can be encountered in general practice. This survey provides an overview of the knowledge of General Practice interns in the Auvergne Rhône Alpes region about the management of ankle ligament injuries. Generally speaking, the interns do not seem to feel very confident with their care. Their knowledge varies from one area to another. Their knowledge of anatomy seems adequate. Clinical examination is the weak spot in their training, whether in terms of applying the Ottawa criteria or using clinical tests. Yet, this doesn’t have a proportional impact on their immediate management, particularly with regard to syndesmosis. In both clinical cases, the near majority, if not the majority, of interns follows the recommendations in the literature. As anticipated, lateral sprains are better known overall than distal tibiofibular syndesmosis sprains. Since ankle sprains can make up 10% of emergency consultations in the region, better understanding and management of these conditions in office-based practice may reduce the pressure on emergency departments and improve the prognosis of these frequent but highly morbid injuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicSuperconducting and THz Device TechnologyFrench-language works237,207