MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7048536687

Letter by Gen. Nelson Miles reporting on prisoner Jefferson Davis, August 22, 1865

2023· other· en· W7048536687 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrisonSpanish Civil WarSurrenderCompromiseCongressmanWork (physics)WifeWorld War IICivil rights
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jefferson Davis (1808-1889) was an American soldier, plantation owner, and politician. He served as the American Secretary of War from 1853 to 1857 under President Franklin Pierce. Davis then served in the U.S. Senate representing Mississippi. At this time tensions between the North and the South were high, and Davis joined the “Committee of Thirteen” in an effort to find a compromise and avoid war. However, Mississippi left the Union and Davis resigned in January 1861. The following month he was elected President of the Confederate States. He remained in this position during the American Civil War. In 1865 Davis was captured by Union troops. He was indicted for treason and sent to prison for two years. Clement Claiborne Clay (1816-1882) was an American lawyer and politician who served in the Confederate Congress during the Civil War. Jefferson Davis sent Clay to Canada to work as an agent in an attempt to undermine the Union. In 1864 he was living in St. Catharines. His work in Canada proved to be unsuccessful and he left to return to the United States several months later. He was later implicated in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln and decided to surrender to the authorities, hoping that this would help prove his innocence. He was imprisoned at Fort Monroe in Hampton, Virginia, with Jefferson Davis. Both men were released from prison in 1866 or 1867.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0890.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→